Please wait...
1800-212-7858 (Toll Free)
9:00am - 8:00pm IST all days
For Business Enquiry


Thanks, You will receive a call shortly.
Customer Support

You are very important to us

For any content/service related issues please contact on this toll free number


Mon to Sat - 11 AM to 8 PM

1)Show that the relation R defined by (a,b)R(c,d) implies that a+b=c+d on set NxN is an equivalance relation. 2)Show that f:R to R defined by f(x)=(x)power2 is not bijective. 3)f:[-5,infinity) given by f(x)=9(x)power2+6x-5. show f is invertible.

Asked by Archana 10th October 2013, 4:02 AM
Answered by Expert


Reflexivity: Let (a, b) be an arbitrary element of N x N. Then in this case:
(a, b) N x N
=> a, b N
=> a + b = b + a
=> (a, b) R (a, b)
Hence (a, b) R (a, b) for all (a, b) N x N. So, R is reflexive on N x N.

Symmetry: Let (a, b), (c, d) N x N be such that (a, b) R (c, d). Then:
(a, b) R (c, d)
=> a + d = b + c
=> c + b = d + a
=> (c, d) R (a, b)
Thus, (a, b) R (c, d) => (c, d) R (a, b) for all (a, b), (c, d)  N x N
Hence R is symmetric on N x N

Transitivity: Let (a, b), (c , d), (e, f)  N x N such that (a, b) R (c, d) and (c, d) R (e, f).
Then (a, b) R (c, d) => a + d = b + c
(c, d) R (e, f) => c + f = d + e
=> (a + d) + (c + f) = (b + c) + (d + e)


Here, f(-1) = f(1) = 1 but  -1 1

Thus, f is not one-one.

Also, -2 is in the co-domain R but is not the image of any element x in the domain R.

Thus, f is not onto.

Hence f is not bijective.



For f to be invertible, we will prove that f is bijective.

Let x1, x2  R

Then f(x1) = f(x2)

Thus, 'f' is one-one

Obviously, f:R ---> Range (f) is onto.

Thus, 'f' is bijective and hence invertible.

Answered by Expert 10th October 2013, 10:53 AM
Rate this answer
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

You have rated this answer /10

Your answer has been posted successfully!

Free related questions

23rd May 2017, 5:09 PM
23rd May 2017, 1:46 PM
23rd May 2017, 3:24 PM
23rd May 2017, 2:36 PM

Chat with us on WhatsApp