# what is the gravitaionalforce between a particle of mass m and a rod of lenght L which are kept at a distance a

### Asked by Pallavi Chaturvedi | 6th Dec, 2013, 10:54: PM

Expert Answer:

### Given that,
Length of the rod = L
Mass of the particle = M

Let rod AB is placed such that the distance of its near end from the the particle is r.
Cosider an elementary portion PQ of the rod, such that OP = x OQ = x + dx
mass of the portion PQ of the rod = m/L
. Uniform density:

The mass density at any point on the rod is M/L.

Therefore, a portion of the rod with length I has mass (M/L)*I.

In particular, an infinitesemal portion of length dx has (infinitesemal) mass dM=(M/L)*dx

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com
P: 11,935
Sigh.

Not even the modelling of a straight line segment does it seem you are able to accomplish.

I'll do this problem for you; pay CLOSE attention to the structure of the solution procedure:

1. Modelling of a straight line segment:

We have only need of a single coordinate variable (or ordinate, strictly speaking) to describe the linie segment:

We let one end point of the rod lie at x=0, whereas the other end point lies at x=L. (L is the length of the rod)

Thus, the rod is modelled by the interval 0≤x≤L , where any point ON the rod is assigned its own ordinate number "x", lying between 0 and L, where the interpretation of its specific x-value is the distance between the point on the rod and the end-point that has been assigned x-value 0.

2. Positioning of separate point mass:

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com
4. Gravitational attraction on point mass:

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com
4. Gravitational attraction on point mass:

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

F=∫roddF=∫rodGmdM(x−(−a))2=∫rodGmMdxL(x+a)2=GMmL∫L0\fracdx(a+x)2=GMmL(−1a+L+1a)=GMmLL(a+L)a=GMma(a+L)

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com
4. Gravitational attraction on point mass:

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

F=∫roddF=∫rodGmdM(x−(−a))2=∫rodGmMdxL(x+a)2=GMmL∫L0\fracdx(a+x)2=GMmL(−1a+L+1a)=GMmLL(a+L)a=GMma(a+L)

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com
Sigh.

Not even the modelling of a straight line segment does it seem you are able to accomplish.

I'll do this problem for you; pay CLOSE attention to the structure of the solution procedure:

1. Modelling of a straight line segment:

We have only need of a single coordinate variable (or ordinate, strictly speaking) to describe the linie segment:

We let one end point of the rod lie at x=0, whereas the other end point lies at x=L. (L is the length of the rod)

Thus, the rod is modelled by the interval 0≤x≤
###
Answered by Komal Parmar
| 9th Dec, 2013,
05:19: PM

### Kindly Sign up for a personalised experience

- Ask Study Doubts
- Sample Papers
- Past Year Papers
- Textbook Solutions

#### Sign Up

#### Verify mobile number

Enter the OTP sent to your number

Change

. Uniform density:

The mass density at any point on the rod is M/L.

Therefore, a portion of the rod with length I has mass (M/L)*I.

In particular, an infinitesemal portion of length dx has (infinitesemal) mass dM=(M/L)*dx

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

The mass density at any point on the rod is M/L.

Therefore, a portion of the rod with length I has mass (M/L)*I.

In particular, an infinitesemal portion of length dx has (infinitesemal) mass dM=(M/L)*dx

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

P: 11,935

Sigh.

Not even the modelling of a straight line segment does it seem you are able to accomplish.

I'll do this problem for you; pay CLOSE attention to the structure of the solution procedure:

1. Modelling of a straight line segment:

We have only need of a single coordinate variable (or ordinate, strictly speaking) to describe the linie segment:

We let one end point of the rod lie at x=0, whereas the other end point lies at x=L. (L is the length of the rod)

Thus, the rod is modelled by the interval 0≤x≤L , where any point ON the rod is assigned its own ordinate number "x", lying between 0 and L, where the interpretation of its specific x-value is the distance between the point on the rod and the end-point that has been assigned x-value 0.

2. Positioning of separate point mass:

Not even the modelling of a straight line segment does it seem you are able to accomplish.

I'll do this problem for you; pay CLOSE attention to the structure of the solution procedure:

1. Modelling of a straight line segment:

We have only need of a single coordinate variable (or ordinate, strictly speaking) to describe the linie segment:

We let one end point of the rod lie at x=0, whereas the other end point lies at x=L. (L is the length of the rod)

Thus, the rod is modelled by the interval 0≤x≤L , where any point ON the rod is assigned its own ordinate number "x", lying between 0 and L, where the interpretation of its specific x-value is the distance between the point on the rod and the end-point that has been assigned x-value 0.

2. Positioning of separate point mass:

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

4. Gravitational attraction on point mass:

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

4. Gravitational attraction on point mass:

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

F=∫roddF=∫rodGmdM(x−(−a))2=∫rodGmMdxL(x+a)2=GMmL∫L0\fracdx(a+x)2=GMmL(−1a+L+1a)=GMmLL(a+L)a=GMma(a+L)

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

4. Gravitational attraction on point mass:

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

This is quite simply the sum of the attractions it experiences from each point of the rod (each with a location between 0 and L). Thus, summing over the attractions of these mass points (individually called dF)will give us the total force F:

F=∫roddF=∫rodGmdM(x−(−a))2=∫rodGmMdxL(x+a)2=GMmL∫L0\fracdx(a+x)2=GMmL(−1a+L+1a)=GMmLL(a+L)a=GMma(a+L)

Read more: http://www.physicsforums.com

Sigh.

Not even the modelling of a straight line segment does it seem you are able to accomplish.

I'll do this problem for you; pay CLOSE attention to the structure of the solution procedure:

1. Modelling of a straight line segment:

We have only need of a single coordinate variable (or ordinate, strictly speaking) to describe the linie segment:

We let one end point of the rod lie at x=0, whereas the other end point lies at x=L. (L is the length of the rod)

Thus, the rod is modelled by the interval 0≤x≤

Not even the modelling of a straight line segment does it seem you are able to accomplish.

I'll do this problem for you; pay CLOSE attention to the structure of the solution procedure:

1. Modelling of a straight line segment:

We have only need of a single coordinate variable (or ordinate, strictly speaking) to describe the linie segment:

We let one end point of the rod lie at x=0, whereas the other end point lies at x=L. (L is the length of the rod)

Thus, the rod is modelled by the interval 0≤x≤

### Answered by Komal Parmar | 9th Dec, 2013, 05:19: PM

### Kindly Sign up for a personalised experience

- Ask Study Doubts
- Sample Papers
- Past Year Papers
- Textbook Solutions

#### Sign Up

#### Verify mobile number

Enter the OTP sent to your number

Change